Solutions
Fatigue and roster quality analysis
Several months of the actual roster are run through a biomathematical core. The analysis shows where risk builds up, which combinations of factors repeat and which roster changes are worth considering.
What we do
We take several months of the actual roster and run every duty through the same biomathematical core that works inside FRMS.
We then examine the structure: in which parts of the network, which groups and which periods elevated risk builds up, which combinations of factors repeat, and which features of the roster produce them.
Planned and actual data are compared separately. Delays, substitutions and other operational changes can shift the picture materially, so the difference between plan and outcome is examined on its own.
How we work
- Data
- Analysis
- Findings
- Recommendations
Form of the result
From you: the actual roster for three months or more — duties with report, departure, landing and end times, in any machine-readable format. Personal data is not required; a de-identified crew member identifier is enough.
Result: an analytical report with a computed part — the distribution of risk across the network, groups and periods, a review of settled combinations of factors, a list of changes under consideration and an estimate of their effect.
Acceptance: a presentation to your planning department and flight safety office.
Where data falls short: we state which data is missing and over what period the required volume can accrue. No conclusion is drawn on insufficient grounds.
What the airline gets
The calculation shows which formally admissible duties call for additional attention, and on what grounds.
The airline receives a list of roster changes worth considering, together with an estimate of how each change affects the computed result.
This gives planning and the flight safety office a numerical basis for working together.